Rosenfeld, Yards. J. (2010, April). Appointment on line: An upswing of the Sites as a personal intermediary. Presentation from the Population Connection off America Group meetings, Dallas, Texas. [ Links ]
Shtatfeld, R., & Barak, A beneficial. (2009). Points regarding launching social contacts towards the Adult dating sites: A perspective in the public replace concept. Interpersona: An international Record to the Personal Relationships, step 3, 19-37. [ Links ]
Skopek, J., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H-P. (2010). Whom relationships exactly who? Informative homophily into the online mate solutions. European Sociological Remark. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S. (1998a). Insiders’ views on the reasons for having appeal so you’re able to an almost other. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61, 287-three hundred. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S. (1998b). What enjoys partnered couples keen on one another? Totally free Inquiry inside the Creative Sociology, twenty-six, 193-two hundred. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet talk: The importance of thought of interaction having close and you will friendship appeal feel during the a rating-acquainted with big date. Identification and you may Societal Therapy Bulletin, 20, 391400. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). The newest influence off mothers and family into quality and you can balances regarding close relationship: Good about three-revolution longitudinal analysis. Diary of ily, 54, 888-900. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Intimate partners’ thinking off social networking characteristics toward passing of time and relationships transitions. [ Backlinks ]
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Willetts, Yards. C. (2002). Social networks and change from inside the individual matchmaking. Inside the A. Vangelisti, H. Reis, & M. A good. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Balance and change in Relationships (pp. 257-284). Cambridge: Cambridge School Drive. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Preference some things (in a number of people) more someone else: Companion tastes in the personal dating and you can relationships. Log away from Personal and private Dating, 19, 463-481. [ Links ]
Private Matchmaking, eight, 325-340
Sprecher, S., Schwartz, P., Harvey, J., & Hatfield, Elizabeth. (2008). Inside S. Sprecher, An effective. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Manual of matchmaking initiation (pp. 249-265). Ny: Therapy Press/Taylor & Francis. [ Website links ]
Straaten, We., Engles, R. C. Yards. E., Finkenauer, C., & The netherlands, R. W. (2009). Fulfilling their meets: Just how attractiveness resemblance affects method conclusion during the combined-sex dyads. Identification and you may Public Mindset Bulletin, thirty-five, 685-697. [ Links ]
Sunnafrank, M., & Miller, Grams. R. (1981). New part out-of initial discussions within the deciding appeal so you can similar and dissimilar visitors. People Communications Look, 8, 16-twenty five. [ Hyperlinks ]
Sunnafrank, M., & Ramirez, An excellent. (2004). At first sight: Persistent relational outcomes of score-knowledgeable about discussions. Journal out-of Societal and personal Dating, 21, 361-379. [ Links ]
Tenny, Elizabeth. Roentgen., Turkheimer, Elizabeth., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Are preferred is more than which have a great identification: This new character from complimentary. Record regarding Search inside the Character, 43, 479-585. [ Website links ]
Vangelisti, Good. L., & Perlman, D. (Eds.) (2006). Brand new Cambridge handbook from individual relationship. Cambridge University Press. [ Website links ]
Thebusinessoflove: Matchmaking initiation at the Sites matchmaking functions
Walster, Grams.,W., Hatfield, Elizabeth., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Significance of physical appeal in relationships decisions. Diary out of Personality and Social Mindset, cuatro, 508-516. [ Hyperlinks ]
Watson, D., Klohnen, E. C., Casillas, An effective., Simms, Elizabeth N., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Suits makers and you can package breakers: Analyses from assortative mating during the newlywed people. Record away from Identification, 72, 1029-1068. [ Hyperlinks ]
Whisman, M. An excellent., Coastline, S. R. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Try relationship dissension taxonic and certainly https://kissbrides.com/sv/amourfactory-recension/ will taxonic condition end up being reviewed dependably? Is a result of a national, representative attempt of married people. Log off Consulting and you may Logical Therapy, 76, 745-755. [ Hyperlinks ]